28 February 2026 13:02 PM
NEWS DESK
The Trump administration has expanded legal action following a protest held at a church in Minnesota against an immigration enforcement operation, intensifying a growing national debate over religious freedom and freedom of expression.
The protest took place on January 18 at Cities Church in Saint Paul, Minnesota. Demonstrators gathered in opposition to the administration’s controversial immigration crackdown known as “Operation Metro Surge.” Protesters specifically targeted Pastor David Easterwood, who also serves as a local official with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
While the administration has characterized the protest as “an attack on religious freedom,” demonstrators described it as a peaceful protest against what they called inhumane immigration policies.
Charges Increased to 39
Initially, nine individuals were charged. However, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Friday via social media that formal charges have now been filed against an additional 30 individuals, bringing the total number of defendants to 39. Authorities have arrested 25 people so far.
Bondi issued a warning, stating: “You cannot attack houses of worship. If you do, we will find you and prosecute you.”
The 39 defendants face charges including interference with religious freedom and conspiracy. According to the complaint, protesters entered the church, intimidated the pastor and congregants, and blocked access routes.
One of the most controversial aspects of the case is the inclusion of journalists and civil society figures among those charged. Former CNN anchor Don Lemon and journalist Georgia Fort have stated they were present solely in a professional capacity to cover the event, not to participate in the protest.
They have described the legal action as an infringement on press freedom.
The protest followed allegations of violence during immigration enforcement operations in Minnesota. Public anger intensified after a woman identified as Renee Good was fatally shot by an ICE agent, according to reports. The incident sparked wider demonstrations across the state.
Although the government has indicated that the operation is being scaled back, civil rights advocates say they will continue monitoring the administration’s actions closely.
The case has added a new dimension to the ongoing national debate over the balance between religious liberty, law enforcement authority, and the constitutional right to free speech and protest.
Comments Here: